Fraud can kill you. Kount is the antidote. Kount fights the toughest cybercrime that robs your company of sales and time. Our SaaS (software as a service) Dynamic Fraud Detection platform offers:
- Patented Device Fingerprinting
- Patented IP Proxy Piercing
- Dynamic Fraud Scoring with customizable fraud settings and automation tools
Come see a demo at NRF Booth #124 and ask for Jeremy and mention AllPayNews for a special offer or request more information and up to 60 days free trial
Share
From this page you can share Addressing The ATM Fraud Landscape and Challenges to a social bookmarking site or email a link to the page.| Social Web | |
|---|---|
Addressing The ATM Fraud Landscape and ChallengesSubmitted by epayments on June 17, 2008 - 7:22pm.By Mike Fenton, Parascript, LLC (www.AllPayNews.com) Powerful market forces are changing today's banking and financial services market. With further globalization, consolidation, deregulation and diversification of the financial industry, banks face many challenges: competition gets tougher, customer service demands increase, profit margins shrink, technology evolves, and new products are introduced more frequently. To gain an advantage in this intensely competitive environment, banks need to recognize changing customer needs, find appropriate products to meet them, and manage risks associated with new products. ATMs are just one important aspect of interacting with customers that continues to evolve. Customers have come to rely on them for convenience and ease in accessing their financial institution and making transactions without the need for a human interface or bank teller. This type of service answers the demands of our fast-paced society and may seem unconditionally attractive. Since the establishment of the first ATM networks in the early 1970s, ATMs have become an essential and convenient component of consumer banking technology. Across the world they are already being used for new and innovative services that keep customers satisfied: cash withdrawals, deposits, currency exchange, printing checks, paying bills, to name a few. In a dynamic and highly competitive world it is imperative for banks to answer these needs and expand ATM services. However, in the United States ATM functions are limited to basic services. About 80% of transactions involve cash withdrawal, 20% are used for basic banking functions, such as balance inquiries, transfers and deposits, where deposits count for half of the activity.[1] Throughout the years ATMs have had periods of active expansion and of abated interest, when the rise in the number of machines has been accompanied by a decline in utilization. Although envelope-free ATMs cost more, the multiple benefits provided by the technology help to justify the investment. Besides eliminating fraud losses, which are often hard to measure, these machines save banks millions of dollars by scanning images of the checks and eliminating the need to transport paper documents to the processing centers. It is estimated that envelope deposits made at ATMs and by tellers cost about $1.70 each to process, while electronically scanned versions cost 40 cents[3]. However, the idea of image-enabled ATM is not enough to ensure the success of the project (enterprise). The quality of implementation is one of the key factors that may either bring few to little, or significant benefits. That is why it is crucially important to choose a reliable provider that is able to ensure a read rate and accuracy acceptable for the application. Such products are available, and have been used (and proven in efficiency and reliability) by financial institutions in back office check processing for years. Nowadays, read rates and accuracy have achieved a level that is acceptable for applications that involve direct interface with a customer, where a high false alarm rate could cause discontent and a reduction in usage. In addition to amount recognition, technology can execute CAR/LAR mismatch detection by verifying that the legal amount and courtesy amount are the same. This feature helps to detect check alterations and prevent fraud. Other fraud detection solutions are also available and, if integrated in ATMs, can help combat fraud. For example, signature verification can be performed at the time of deposit on “on-us checks,” as well as be used to verify signatures on checks between members of an image exchange network if the images of signatures are shared. Mr. Fenton is vice president of sales and operations for Parascript (www.parascript.com) and has more than 25 years of experience in the industry. He can be reached at mike.fenton@parascript.com or (303) 381-3105. »
| |






Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Icerocket







